|
WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
OBJECTIVE |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
The management of
sewerage networks, sewerage purification and the operation of a tanker
service in areas without waterborne systems. |
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
Description |
Estimate |
July |
August |
September |
October |
November |
December |
January |
February |
March |
April |
May |
June |
|
35 |
|
|
|
2005/2006 |
2005/2006 |
2005/2006 |
2005/2006 |
2005/2006 |
2005/2006 |
2005/2006 |
2005/2006 |
2005/2006 |
2005/2006 |
2005/2006 |
2005/2006 |
2005/2006 |
|
40 |
|
|
Expenditure - Budget |
R 10,000 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
|
45 |
|
|
Expenditure - Actual |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
|
50 |
|
|
Capital Expenditure - Budget |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
|
55 |
|
|
Capital Expenditure - Actual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Income - Budget |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
|
65 |
|
10 |
|
Income - Actual |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
R 0 |
|
70 |
|
|
Nett (Surplus)/Deficit - Budget |
R 10,000 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
R 833 |
|
75 |
|
20 |
|
80 |
|
30 |
|
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS – WHAT |
Who |
Target date |
Performance |
ADD Costs |
30-Sep |
30-Dec |
31-Mar |
30-Jun |
30-Sep |
30-Dec |
31-Mar |
30-Jun |
Performance |
30-Sep |
30-Dec |
31-Mar |
30-Jun |
|
|
|
AVERAGE PERFORMANCE |
|
85 |
|
40 |
|
|
Measurement % |
To Budget |
Target % |
Target % |
Target % |
Target % |
Actual % |
Actual % |
Actual % |
Actual % |
Area |
Performance % |
Performance % |
Performance % |
Performance % |
Reason for performance status |
Remedial action takes |
Committee |
FOR THE YEAR |
|
90 |
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
60 |
| |
SEWERAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
100 |
|
70 |
| 1 |
Construction
of 500 UDS toilets by June 06. Locations: Pella, Okiep, Kharkams,
Buffelsrivier |
Head:
Infrastructure |
30-Jun-06 |
30% |
External |
10 |
40 |
70 |
100 |
80 |
|
|
|
Org |
30% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
Progress beyond expectation |
|
|
7.50% |
|
|
|
80 |
| 2 |
Ensure
that all correspondence marked out to the Waste Water Management Segment
receives attention within three (3) working days after receipt from the
Registration office. |
Head:
Infrastructure |
Continuous |
|
|
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
|
|
|
Org |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
ACTUAL SCORE FOR THE VOTE |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL FOR THE VOTE - % |
|
30% |
|
|
|
Waste
Water Management Vote Performance for September 2005 |
30.00% |
100.00% |
|
|
CONVERTED TO 100% FOR
THE VOTE |
100.00% |
|
|
Waste
Water Management Vote Performance for December 2005 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
|
|
Waste
Water Management Vote Performance for March 2006 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
|
|
Waste
Water Management Vote Performance for June 2006 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
|
|
|
Waste
Water Management Vote Average Performance for the Year |
7.50% |
25.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|